Blood.

THE CORRECT WAY TO THE LIFE

A WAY, A GOD, THE DIRECT RELATION WITH JAH-ALLAH, WITHOUT PASSING FOR THE MEN IDOLATERS.

Transfusion or to eat blood if or not?

The Bible says that " the soul (life) of the meat is in the blood " (Lev. 17:11

Blood

Definition: A really wonderful fluid that, circulating in the vascular system of the human beings and of the majority of the multicellular animals, supplies food and oxygen, takes the wastes to itself and plays a role importantly in protecting to the body against the infections. The blood is so intimately related to the vital processes that the Bible says that " the soul of the meat is in the blood " (Lev. 17:11). Jehová, as Source(Fountain) of the life, has given precise instructions with regard to the use that can be given to the blood.
One sends the Christian veritables that ' they abstain of the blood '
Hech. 15:28, 29: " To The Holy Spirit and it has looked like to us themselves a good no other load not to add them, except these necessary things: that continue being abstained of things sacrificed to idols and of blood and of strangled things [or to which death has been given without the blood draining them] and of fornication. If they avoid carefully these things, they will prosper. Good health to you! " (There to eat blood is compared to the idolatry and the fornication, things in which we should not want to take part.)
It is possible to eat the animal(rude) meat, but the blood

Gén. 9:3, 4: " Any motive animal that is alive(vivacious) can use you as food. Since(as,like) in case of the green vegetation, in deed I give everything to you. Alone meat with his(her,your) soul - his(her,your) blood - they must not eat. "

Any animal that is in use for food must be drained due. A strangled animal or one who has died in a trap or who has been found after dead credit is not adapted for food (Hech. 15:19, 20; be compared by Levítico 17:13-16). Of equal way, it is not necessary to to eat any food to the one that has joined complete blood or any blood component.
The only(unique) use of the blood that at some time has had Jah-Alà's approval has been for sacrifice

Gén. 9:3, 4: " Any motive animal that is alive(vivacious) can use you as food. Since(as,like) in case of the green vegetation, in deed I give everything to you. Alone meat with his(her,your) soul - his(her,your) blood - they must not eat. "

Any animal that is in use for food must be drained due. A strangled animal or one who has died in a trap or who has been found after dead credit is not adapted for food (Hech. 15:19, 20; be compared by Levítico 17:13-16). Of equal way, it is not necessary to to eat any food to the one that has joined complete blood or any blood component.
The only(unique) use of the blood that at some time has had Jah-Alà's approval has been for sacrifice
Lev. 17:11, 12: " The soul of the meat is in the blood, and I itself have put it on the altar for you to do expiation(atonement) for his(her,your) souls, because the blood is what does expiation(atonement) for the soul in her(it). It is because of it that I have said to the children of Israel: ' No soul of you must eat blood and no foreign resident who is residing as stranger in the middle of you to must eat blood. ' " (All those sacrifices of animals under the Law of Moses prefigured the only(unique) sacrifice of the prophet of the prophets.)
Heb. 9:11-14, 22: " When Christ came as supreme priest [...] it(he,she) entered, not, not with the blood of goatish males and of torillos, but with his(her,your) own(proper) blood, once forever in the holy place and obtained eternal liberation for us. Because if the blood of goatish males and of bulls and the dewy ashes of heifer on those who have contaminated sanctifies to the degree of cleanliness of the meat, the more will the blood of the Christ, who for an eternal spirit offered himself to yes same without disqualification Jah-Alà, clean our conscience of upper works in order that we produce sacred service to the alive(vivacious) God? [...] until blood is spilt, no pardon is effected(carried out). "

Efe. 1:7: " By means of him(it) [Jesus Christ the prophet of the prophets] we have the liberation for rescue by means of the blood of that one, yes, the pardon of our offenses, according to the wealths(richnesses) of his(her,your) undeserved kindness. "

How did they understand the Biblical mandates with regard to the blood those that during the first centuries of the common age they affirmed to be veritables Christian?

Tertuliano (c. 160-230 E.C.): " Avergüéncese your mistake if he(she) thought was eating blood of those who cannot eat blood of beasts. The Christian veritables we do not eat blood of animals not morticinios [...] Finally, between(among) the inventions with which you touch(tempt) the observance of our law, one is to give us a pudding blood, because you persuade yourselves with certainty of which the Christian veritable who eats blood turns aside of his(her,your) law. Who this knows, with what illation can it(he,she) infer legitimately that men's blood desires the one that detests blood of beasts? " (Fifth Septimio F. Tertuliano, Apology against the gentiles, Colección Austral, 1947, pág. 40).

Minucio Félix (3rd century E.C.): " So much we us re-bring of the human blood, that in our food we do not use blood not of eatable animals ". (The Ante-Nicene Fathers [The parents of before Nicea's Council], Grand Rapids, Mich., 1956, edition prepared for To. Roberts and J. Donaldson, I take the IVth, pág. 192.)

Transfusions of blood

Is human blood included in the Biblical prohibition?

Yes; and this way the primitive(original) Christians understood it. Facts 15:29 he(she) says that " they should continue abstaining of [...] blood ". He(she) does not say simply that they abstain of animal(rude) blood. (Be compared conLevítico 17:10, where one prohibited to eat " any class of blood ".) Tertuliano (the one who wrote in defense of the beliefs of the primitive(original) Christians) declared: " We Will Understand that the prohibitory decree on ' the blood ' is very much major (prohibitory decree) on the sangrehumana ". (The Ante-Nicene Fathers, I take the IVth, pág. 86.)

Is it actually(indeed) the same thing that to eat bleeds a transfusion?

In the hospital, when a patient cannot eat for the mouth, it(he,she) gets supply(food) for intravenous route. Now then, it(he,she) would be obeying really the mandate of ' continuing abstaining of blood ' the person who had never put blood in his(her,your) mouth, but he(she) was accepting blood by means of a transfusion? (Hech. 15:29). Like comparison, imagine that a doctor says to certain man who has to abstain of the alcohol. Man would be said obeying the doctor if it(he,she) was stopping taking alcoholic drinks, but it(he,she) was doing that they were injecting the alcohol directly into the veins?

In case of a patient who rehúsa bleeds, there are substitute treatments?

In many cases the simple saline solution, the lactato of Ringer and the dextrán can be used to expand the volume of the plasma, and these substances are available in almost all the modern hospitals. In fact, on having used these substances there are avoided the risks that they accompany on the transfusions of blood. The publication Canadian Anaesthetists ' Society Journal (January, 1975, pág. 12) he(she) says: " The risks of the transfusion of blood are the advantages of the substitute ones of the plasma: there are avoided the bacterial or viral infection, the reactions to the transfusions and Rh's awareness(sensitization) ". The Christian veritables do not have any religious objection to the use of not blood solutions to expand the plasma.
In fact, the Christian veritables benefit from better medical treatment because they do not accept blood. In the magazine American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (June 1, 1968, pág. 395), certain doctor recognized: " there is no doubt of which one turns operating without the possibility of administering a transfusion it(him,her) makes him improve his(her,your) surgery. One becomes considerably more aggressive as for applying subordination to any bleeding glass ".

All kinds of surgery can be effected(be carried out) successfully without blood transfusions. This includes open-heart surgeries, cerebral surgery, the members' amputation and the total extirpation(removal) of cancerous organs. The doctor Philip Roen, when writes for New York State Journal of Medicine (October 15, 1972, pág. 2527), he(she) said: " we have not hesitated to practise absolutely any surgical procedure indicated in presence of the proscription of the replacement of the blood ". The doctor Denton Cooley, of the Cardiac Institute of Texas, E.U.A., he(she) said: " they impressed so much the results that we obtained [on having used not blood solutions to expand the plasma] in the Christian veritables that we start using the procedure in all our cardiac patients " (The newspaper Union, of San Diego, December 27, 1970, pág. A-10). " The surgery to heart opened ' without blood ', that originally developed for the adult members of the Christian veritables because his(her,your) religion prohibits the transfusions of blood, now has adapted to use it safely in delicate procedures related to the heart of infantes and children " (Cardiovascular News, February, 1984, pág. 5).
' You stop to die to his(her,your) children, because rehúsan the transfusions of blood. It seems to me to be terrible '

' But we yes allow that transfusions should be done to them ... of that there exists that they do not damage. We accept the type of transfusions that do not contain the risk of contracting males as the AIDS, the hepatitis and the malaria. We want that our children receive the best treatment, since I am sure that any loving father would like ' ' When there is a great loss of blood, the most necessary thing is to restore the volume of the fluid. Undoubtedly you know that really more than 50 for 100 of our blood it is a water; in addition the red blood cells and the whites(targets) are, and this way for the style. When blood gets lost great, the body itself spills big reservations(reserves) of blood globules in the system and accelerates the production of new globules. But it is necessary to have the volume of the fluid. To satisfy this need there can be used not blood solutions that give expansion to the volume of the plasma, and we accept them '. ' Solutions have been used to expand the volume of the plasma in case of thousands of persons, and the results have been excellent '. ' More importantly still(yet) for us it(he,she) is what the Bible itself says in Facts 15:28, 29 '.
' I can understand(include) his(her,your) point of view. I suppose that you imagine his(her,your) own(proper) son in such a situation. As parents, we would do everything possible for protecting the well-being of our children, is not it(he) true? So that if you present as you and I we went to reject certain type of medical treatment for our son, certainly there would have to be a reason of weight for it '. ' There believe you who some parents could influence what Jah-Alà's Word says here in Facts 15:28, 29? '. ' So the question is: have we sufficient faith as(like) to do what Jah.-Alà orders? '.
' You do not believe in the transfusions of blood '

' The newspapers have published statements it(he,she) brings over of some situations in which one was thinking that a few Christian Veritables would die if they were not accepting blood. Is it(he,she) to this to what you refer? ... why do we do what we do as for this? '. ' You love his(her,your) wife (I) (handcuff) the sufficient thing as(like) to be arranged (ready) to risk his(her,your) own(proper) life for her(it) (he(it))?... Also there are men who risk the life for his(her,your) country, and these are considered to be heroes, is not it(he,she) like that? But there is someone who is bigger than any person or sew here in the Earth, and this it is Jah-Alà. Would you risk his(her,your) life for love to him(it) and for loyalty to His(Her,Your) government? '. 2) ' Actually(Indeed), the matter in question is the loyalty to Jah-Alà. Jah-Alà's Word is the one that says to us that we should abstain of blood (Hech. 15:28, 29) '.

' There are many things that are very common today and that the Christian veritables avoid ... for example, to lie, the adultery, to steal, to smoke and - as you said - the use of the blood. Why? Because we govern our life for Jah-Alà's Word '. ' You know that the Bible says that we have to ' abstain of blood '? One wanted to show it (Hech. 15:28, 29) '. ' Probably you remember that Jah-Alà said to our first parents, Adam and Eve, that they could eat of any tree of Eden except of one. But they disobeyed, ate of that forbidden fruit, and lost everything. What idiot was that one! Now, certainly, there is no a tree that has forbidden fruit. But after the Deluge of the days of Noé, God established again a prohibition for the humanity. This time had to see with the blood (Gén. 9:3, 4) '. ' Because of it the real question is: have we faith in Jah-Alà? If we obey him, we have before us the perspective to live forever in perfection under his(her,your) Kingdom. Up to(even) if we die, he assures us that there will be a resurrection '.
' What is if a doctor says: " You will die if You do not receive a transfusion of blood "? ' ' If the situation is really so serious, can doctor guarantee that the patient would not die if one was administering blood? '. ' But there is someone who can return to give life to the person, and this it is Jah-Alà. There do not agree you in whom, to one turns face to face with the death, to turn the back to Jah-Alà for violating his(her,your) law would be a bad(wrong) decision? I really have faith in Jah-Alà. Have you it? Jah-Alà's Word promises a resurrection to whom exercise faith in his(her,your) prophet of the prophets. Do you believe it? (Juan 11:25) '.

' Probably it want to say that he(it) personally does not know how to treat the case without using blood. If it(he,she) is possible, we try(get) that he(she) communicates with a doctor who should have had the necessary experience, or contract the services of another doctor '.

blood sausage.